Paid to Play: The Reality of Toronto Photography Permits

An explanation of why the City of Toronto mandates permits for outdoor photography. This post covers the necessity of maintenance funding, space management, and liability coverage in public and semi public spaces.
Introduction
You think because a park is "public," you have an unfettered right to use it as your studio. You’re wrong. In Toronto, the moment your hobby turns into a "formal" session—weddings, graduations, or commercial work—the city expects its cut. It isn’t just a "cash grab," though it feels like one when you’re writing the check. It’s about the logistics of shared space and the cost of maintaining the backdrop you’re exploiting for your portfolio.
Maintenance and Infrastructure
Those manicured gardens at Edwards Gardens or the clean paths at the Music Garden don't stay that way by accident. Permit fees are channeled back into Parks, Forestry & Recreation. If you’re using a location because it looks "premium," you are paying for the upkeep of that aesthetic. Without permit revenue, these locations would quickly degrade into the same grey, neglected patches of dirt you’re trying to avoid.
Conflict Resolution
A permit is essentially a reservation. Without a permit system, popular spots like the Guild Park or Humber Bay would be a chaotic brawl of tripods and bridal parties. Paying for a permit grants you a specific window of time where you have a documented right to be there. It gives park staff the authority to move along the "uncle with a camera" who is blocking your shot. You aren't paying for the grass; you're paying for the right to not be interrupted.
Liability and Risk
Commercial and formal photography involve equipment, crews, and distracted subjects. If a light stand blows over and hits a cyclist, or a bridesmaid trips in a hole, the city needs to know who is responsible. Most permits require proof of $2 million in liability insurance. The fee covers the administrative cost of vetting these documents and ensuring that when things go wrong on public land, the taxpayer isn't the one footed with the bill.
Impact Control
Large shoots are invasive. They block paths, take up parking, and disturb the peace that other residents pay taxes to enjoy. By requiring permits, the city can cap the number of shoots happening simultaneously. It prevents "High Park" from becoming "High Studio." If everyone could shoot for free whenever they wanted, the very locations you find "iconic" would be unusable for everyone else.
The Cost of Exclusivity
While a permit doesn't always guarantee you a private cordoned-off area, it does grant you "permitted use." In high-demand areas like Casa Loma or the Distillery District (which are private but function as public landmarks), the fee is the price of admission. If you want a cinematic backdrop, you pay the gatekeeper. It’s a business transaction: you get the shot, they get the revenue to keep the lights on.


Final Thoughts
If you don't like the fees, find a different line of work. Professionalism involves overhead. Complaining about permit costs is a sign that you haven't yet factored the reality of business into your "art." Secure the permit, build the cost into your client’s invoice, and stop acting surprised when the city asks for its piece of the action.
Some bonus content
Hey there! Just sharing some thoughts, fun insights, and cool stories from my photography adventures. Come check out my creative process and what I've been working on lately!





